Hygiene scores for London restaurants
How clean is the restaurant you‘re eating in?
Time Out dishes the dirt with the new Scores On The Doors ratings, but asks if the idea is as black-and-white as it might appear - as anyone who has seen the movie ‘Ratatouille’ will be aware, no-one is keen on seeing rats in the kitchen.
But is there the clear correlation between food hygiene and culinary excellence that you might expect? You may imagine they are inextricably linked, but this is not always the case.
80,000 secret council files on food hygiene ratings of places to eat and drink in London have recently been made accessible online to the general public, and some outlets have also posted their results in their windows – a ‘Score on the Door’, as recognised by the Food Standards Agency.
The top-rated (ie cleanest) places get five stars, and as the star rating drops, so do standards. Though Scores on the Doors is currently only a trial scheme, it is backed by the Food Standards Agency, the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) and the consumer organisation Which?, so pressure exists to make it permanent. These supporters, and the 25+ London councils currently participating in the scheme, say it’s great news for the customer, transforming poor hygiene in restaurants almost overnight. But if your favourite neighbourhood restaurant scored badly, would you still eat there? If you saw the sous chef wiping his nose on his sleeve or the new recruit in the kitchen was revealed never to wash his hands after visiting the loo, would you reconsider your dinner reservation?
The government’s Food Law Codes of Practice recommend that Environmental Health Officers grade food premises on a star scale of one to five, based on criteria including food hygiene, confidence in management and structural standards (including pest-proofing).
A ‘no stars’ rating indicates a failure to comply with legal requirements, including little or no appreciation of food safety, while five stars shows that the restaurant adheres to the very best standards of food hygiene. High-risk premises will be inspected every six months and the low-risk every two years. The numerical scores you see listed are like points on a driving licence – the more a premises has, the worse the record.
At the moment, premises are not legally required by the council to publish their results ‘on the door’, but this hardly matters as ratings can be checked here.
Is this too much information? Or should Scores on the Doors be praised for highlighting serious flaws in food hygiene, while allowing those with the best standards to walk tall?
One man’s ‘harmless little cockroach’ could be another’s salmonella, that the little blighter might be carrying when it wanders across the food prep surface on which your dessert is being lovingly constructed.
So, what happens to the venues that are the dunces in food hygiene class? Venues awarded less than two stars for Scores on the Doors can expect ‘enforcement action’ if things don’t improve – assuming they’re still in business by the time the Environmental Health Officer visits again.
However, given the national shortage of suitably qualified EHOs – there are currently 700 vacant posts in councils nationwide – the wait for reassessment could be lengthy.
How clean is the restaurant you‘re eating in?Time Out dishes the dirt with the new Scores On The Doors ratings, but asks if the idea is as black-and-white as it might appear - as anyone who has seen the movie ‘Ratatouille’ will be aware, no-one is keen on seeing rats in the kitchen.
But is there the clear correlation between food hygiene and culinary excellence that you might expect? You may imagine they are inextricably linked, but this is not always the case.
80,000 secret council files on food hygiene ratings of places to eat and drink in London have recently been made accessible online to the general public, and some outlets have also posted their results in their windows – a ‘Score on the Door’, as recognised by the Food Standards Agency.
The top-rated (ie cleanest) places get five stars, and as the star rating drops, so do standards. Though Scores on the Doors is currently only a trial scheme, it is backed by the Food Standards Agency, the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) and the consumer organisation Which?, so pressure exists to make it permanent. These supporters, and the 25+ London councils currently participating in the scheme, say it’s great news for the customer, transforming poor hygiene in restaurants almost overnight. But if your favourite neighbourhood restaurant scored badly, would you still eat there? If you saw the sous chef wiping his nose on his sleeve or the new recruit in the kitchen was revealed never to wash his hands after visiting the loo, would you reconsider your dinner reservation?
The government’s Food Law Codes of Practice recommend that Environmental Health Officers grade food premises on a star scale of one to five, based on criteria including food hygiene, confidence in management and structural standards (including pest-proofing).
A ‘no stars’ rating indicates a failure to comply with legal requirements, including little or no appreciation of food safety, while five stars shows that the restaurant adheres to the very best standards of food hygiene. High-risk premises will be inspected every six months and the low-risk every two years. The numerical scores you see listed are like points on a driving licence – the more a premises has, the worse the record.
At the moment, premises are not legally required by the council to publish their results ‘on the door’, but this hardly matters as ratings can be checked here.
Is this too much information? Or should Scores on the Doors be praised for highlighting serious flaws in food hygiene, while allowing those with the best standards to walk tall?
One man’s ‘harmless little cockroach’ could be another’s salmonella, that the little blighter might be carrying when it wanders across the food prep surface on which your dessert is being lovingly constructed.
So, what happens to the venues that are the dunces in food hygiene class? Venues awarded less than two stars for Scores on the Doors can expect ‘enforcement action’ if things don’t improve – assuming they’re still in business by the time the Environmental Health Officer visits again.
However, given the national shortage of suitably qualified EHOs – there are currently 700 vacant posts in councils nationwide – the wait for reassessment could be lengthy.
